Jesper De Jong vs Kamil Majchrzak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Kamil Majchrzak's second serve compare to Jesper De Jong's? In the last six months, Jesper De Jong slightly outperformed Majchrzak, winning 46.72% of points compared to 43.67% for Majchrzak. This indicates a slight edge for De Jong in second serve scenarios.
• What about their return game? Jesper De Jong again shows a minor edge, winning 44.46% of his opponents' second serve points, compared to 43.05% for Majchrzak. However, Majchrzak is more effective on first serve returns, indicating he might convert more opportunities.
• When placed under pressure, what are their breakpoint saving capabilities? Jesper De Jong has saved 58.11% of breakpoints, slightly better than Majchrzak's 56.13%, signaling De Jong's resilience under pressure.
• In terms of overall match performance over the past year, who stands out? Kamil Majchrzak has a higher win percentage at 65.00% compared to Jesper De Jong's 53.73%, suggesting Majchrzak's consistency gives him a notable advantage.
• On what surface do they excel? Both players share a strong performance on Hard courts at 67%, though Majchrzak struggles on Indoor Hard while De Jong is weaker on Grass.
• Regarding their experience at high-level tournaments, Majchrzak has a slight edge, winning 57.89% of his matches on the Main tour compared to De Jong's 55.17%.
• In their direct head-to-head encounter, Majchrzak leads 1-0, having won both sets in their only meeting. Could this give Majchrzak a psychological edge?
• Do their opponents' average ranks provide any insights? Both have faced similarly ranked players over the past year, Majchrzak at 156.42 and De Jong at 156.63.
• When matches extend to a deciding set, Jesper De Jong is slightly more successful, winning 60% compared to Majchrzak's 56%.

Editorial Prediction (October 25, 2025, UTC):

Examining the statistics, Kamil Majchrzak demonstrates consistent performance over the past year, reflected in his higher win percentage. His excellence on Hard surfaces and slight edge in top-level tournament play further strengthen his case.

Although Jesper De Jong has shown resilience under pressure and a slightly better second serve performance, Majchrzak's dominance in their previous head-to-head and superior overall match win record cannot be overlooked.

Given these considerations, Kamil Majchrzak is favored to win the forthcoming match, although a closely contested game is anticipated.